#no really
There is no phallic or homoerotic imagery in ancient Mesopotamian art and literature. Nope.
Gilgamesh is totes just playing with the Bull of Heaven. For realsies.
#in terms of phallic imagery #is fucking a bull (the archetype of masculinity) #more like bestiality #or like doing a giant penis?
Dinos + Sherlock Holmes = OTP (it’s trufax* canon).
* 15. Arrange somehow for John to shoot Anderson in his useless, pathetic face. Preferably at the Natural History Museum, because Anderson once had to put a lizard skeleton in an evidence bag and he looked ill, and dinosaur skeletons are like lizards but much bigger, and thus proportionally Anderson probably loathes dinosaurs still more, and I therefore would like a dinosaur to be the last thing the prat ever sees.
Yaknow, I was ok with the new BBC episodes being pushed back to next year. I was more than ok with the casting for Irene Adler and with Stephen Moffat writing it.
But this. This has finally crossed some kind of line for me. And I am so not ok with it.
“…So CBS will solve those problems with its own modern-day update, Sherlock Holmes, a project that at last has absolutely nothing to do with British people, who for too long have profited off of Sherlock Holmes simply because he’s from there.”
(via mazarin221b)
I was browsing through a recent issue of Marie Claire and stumbled upon this advertisement.
This post might explain a bit more. I don’t agree with everything in said post, mind, but I do agree with the general gist of it.
Just. Yeah. What the hell??